Eeny Meeny Miney Mo Foundation
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Education
    • Survival-Based Rejection
    • Levels and Interventions
    • Alienating Tactics
    • Cognitive Distortions
    • Videos
    • SBR vs Estrangement
    • Parental Child Abduction
    • Intergenerational Trauma
    • Academic Articles
    • Shared Parenting
  • Get Involved
  • Help For You
    • Young People
    • Parents
    • Grandparents
    • Schools
  • More
    • UNSEEN Campaign
    • Submissions
    • Petition
    • EMMM Newsletter
    • Resources
  • More
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Education
      • Survival-Based Rejection
      • Levels and Interventions
      • Alienating Tactics
      • Cognitive Distortions
      • Videos
      • SBR vs Estrangement
      • Parental Child Abduction
      • Intergenerational Trauma
      • Academic Articles
      • Shared Parenting
    • Get Involved
    • Help For You
      • Young People
      • Parents
      • Grandparents
      • Schools
    • More
      • UNSEEN Campaign
      • Submissions
      • Petition
      • EMMM Newsletter
      • Resources
  • Sign In

  • My Account
  • Signed in as:

  • filler@godaddy.com


  • My Account
  • Sign out

Eeny Meeny Miney Mo Foundation

Signed in as:

filler@godaddy.com

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Education
    • Survival-Based Rejection
    • Levels and Interventions
    • Alienating Tactics
    • Cognitive Distortions
    • Videos
    • SBR vs Estrangement
    • Parental Child Abduction
    • Intergenerational Trauma
    • Academic Articles
    • Shared Parenting
  • Get Involved
  • Help For You
    • Young People
    • Parents
    • Grandparents
    • Schools
  • More
    • UNSEEN Campaign
    • Submissions
    • Petition
    • EMMM Newsletter
    • Resources

Account


  • My Account
  • Sign out


  • Sign In
  • My Account
PETITION

We are calling for a legislative change in Australia

Child coercive control and alienating behaviours are child abuse and family violence

SIGN PETITION HERE

A child should never be made to carry the lifelong consequences of an adult’s coercive control, fabricated claims, emotional manipulation, or misuse of protective systems. When these behaviours turn a child against a safe parent or family member, the harm reaches far beyond lost time.  It can sever family bonds, distort the child’s sense of safety, damage  trust, fracture identity, and leave them grieving relationships,  memories, belonging, and a family history that was taken from them  before they were old enough to question it.


We are calling for Australian law to recognise and respond to  child coercive control and alienating behaviours as serious forms of  psychological abuse and family violence, particularly where children are  manipulated into rejecting safe relationships or where legal and  protective systems are misused to intensify that harm.


These behaviours occur when a parent, caregiver, or influential adult  repeatedly interferes with a child’s relationship with another safe  parent or family member, or acts in ways that damage or destroy that  relationship over time. The pattern may include denigration, fear-based  narratives, emotional pressure, adultification, obstruction of time,  blocked communication, controlled information, rewarded rejection,  punished affection, manufactured fear, loyalty binds, fabricated,  exaggerated, misleading, or strategically timed claims of harm, or the  misuse of police, child protection, schools, health services, lawyers,  courts, protection orders, restraining orders, intervention orders,  domestic and family violence orders, or family law processes to isolate a  child from a safe relationship.


This petition does not seek to minimise genuine abuse, neglect,  family violence, sexual violence, stalking, coercive control, or unsafe  parenting. Children must be protected from real harm, and allegations  must be assessed with rigour, fairness, and urgency. Protection  is undermined when genuine abuse is missed, and when fabricated,  exaggerated, or strategically weaponised claims are allowed to sever a  child’s relationship with a safe parent or family member.


Child coercive control and alienating behaviours go beyond ordinary  post-separation conflict because they involve a pattern of coercive  influence that can place a child under emotional and psychological  pressure to align with one adult against another. A child may be  encouraged to fear, distrust, reject, shame, monitor, report on, or  emotionally punish the other parent or family member. Over time, the  child may come to believe the rejection is entirely their own choice,  when in reality their attachment system has been shaped by fear, guilt,  dependency, approval-seeking, and adult emotional pressure. In this  state, rejection can become survival-based: a way for the child to  reduce distress, avoid disapproval, preserve emotional security, and  stay aligned with the adult they feel they cannot afford to lose.


As the pattern continues, some children are drawn into coerced  alignment with one adult while being pressured to deactivate attachment  to another. They may be praised for rejection, punished for affection,  rewarded for loyalty, interrogated after contact, exposed to adult  allegations, used as messengers, made responsible for an adult’s  distress, or placed in the impossible position of proving love to one  parent by rejecting the other. A child should not have to manage adult  emotions, carry adult allegations, perform loyalty, reject half of their  family, or surrender a safe relationship to preserve peace with the  parent or adult who holds power over their daily life.


Because the harm reaches into identity, attachment, belonging, and  development, children can lose far more than time with one parent. They  can lose siblings, grandparents, extended family, culture, history,  financial security, inheritance, community connection, and the ordinary  developmental protection that comes from being safely loved by more than  one side of their family. Many carry grief, shame, confusion, anxiety,  helplessness, anger, mistrust, and identity disruption into adolescence  and adulthood. Some only understand years later that a relationship was  taken from them before they had the maturity, information, language, or  emotional freedom to question what they were being told.


Targeted parents and family members may also be isolated from the  children they love, falsely characterised as unsafe, excluded from  schools and health information, driven into prolonged litigation,  financially depleted, and forced to defend themselves against claims  that can permanently damage their reputation, employment, mental health,  and family life. Grandparents, siblings, stepparents, kinship carers,  and extended family members can also be cut off, sometimes for years and  sometimes permanently.


When fabricated claims and the misuse of restraining, protection,  intervention, and family law processes become part of the coercive  pattern, children can be frightened, safe relationships can be severed,  and services designed for protection can be drawn into the abuse. These  tactics can contaminate a child’s memories and perceptions, isolate them  from safe family members, delay meaningful intervention, exhaust the  falsely accused parent, and divert protective systems away from children  and adults who are in genuine danger. The weaponisation of systems also  undermines public trust, weakens procedural fairness, and makes it  harder for genuine victim-survivors to be heard, assessed, and  protected.


The pattern is not confined to one gender, sexuality, culture, or  family structure. Mothers, fathers, children, grandparents, kinship  carers, stepfamilies, same-sex parents, blended families, culturally  diverse families, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families,  migrant families, and families of every structure can be affected. The  focus must remain on the pattern of behaviour and its impact on the  child, including coercion, control, manipulation, obstruction,  fear-based influence, and the destruction of safe family relationships.


Current responses are often slow, fragmented, inconsistent, or poorly  informed, leaving children and safe family members without effective  protection until the damage is already entrenched. By the time the  pattern is recognised, the child’s relationship with a safe parent or  family member may already be severely damaged. Childhood cannot be  paused while systems avoid difficult evidence, treat every case as  ordinary conflict, or fail to distinguish genuine safety concerns from  coercive relational harm.


We call on Australian governments to legislate against child coercive control and alienating behaviours by:

  • recognising these behaviours as serious forms of psychological  abuse, family violence, coercive control, and misuse of legal and  protective systems when they harm, or risk harming, a child’s  relationship with a safe parent, caregiver, sibling, grandparent, or  family member
  • requiring early identification, proper assessment, and timely  intervention where a child is being pressured, coached, frightened,  rewarded, punished, adultified, isolated, or manipulated into rejecting a  safe relationship
  • treating fabricated, exaggerated, misleading, or strategically  weaponised claims as serious conduct when they are knowingly made,  encouraged, or used to obstruct a child’s relationship with a safe  family member
  • strengthening consequences for repeated obstruction of court orders,  parenting arrangements, communication, school or medical information,  therapeutic support, professional intervention, or safe reunification
  • improving training across courts, child protection, police, schools,  lawyers, family report writers, contact services, domestic and family  violence services, and mental health professionals
  • ensuring children receive developmentally appropriate support that  protects them from adult conflict, loyalty binds, fear-based narratives,  false allegations, adult emotional dependence, and decisions they are  not developmentally equipped to carry
  • protecting genuine victim-survivors while also recognising that the  misuse of protective systems can become part of the coercive pattern  used to isolate a child from safe family relationships.


Although these behaviours are often minimised as private family  conflict, they are patterns of harm that can alter a child’s  development, identity, attachment relationships, mental health, family  belonging, and future parenting trajectory. When legal and protective  systems are misused to intensify that harm, the law must be capable of  protecting both genuine victims and those harmed by fabricated claims,  procedural abuse, and relational destruction.


Every child deserves protection from coercion and the freedom  to love and be loved by safe family members. Every safe parent,  caregiver, sibling, grandparent, and family member deserves protection  from conduct designed to sever, obstruct, or destroy that relationship.


Please sign this petition to call for legislative reform that  recognises, prevents, and responds to child coercive control,  alienating behaviours, fabricated claims, misuse of restraining and  protection systems, and procedural abuse in Australia.


Your signature on this petition is a signature for the future  of all children who may become a victim of parental separation or  divorce. We are calling for a legislative change.



Copyright © 2026 Eeny Meeny Miney Mo Foundation Ltd | All Rights Reserved.

  • Home
  • Get Involved

Please Sign Our Petition

Parental Alienating Behaviours

are Child Abuse & Family Violence. 

This serious form of abuse and family violence can no longer be ignored.  Parental alienating behaviours must be acknowledged in Australia as it is in other parts of the world. We need legislation that  not only acknowledges its existence but firmly and clearly legislates against it. 

Sign Here

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

DeclineAccept