Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com


Children can reject a parent for very different reasons, and those reasons are not always visible from the surface behaviour. In some families, a child’s distancing reflects realistic self-protection in response to substantiated harm, neglect, or longstanding caregiving failures. In other families, rejection develops through cumulative relational pressure, loyalty conflicts, and attachment threat within coercive family dynamics. Both pathways can present as “the child refuses contact”, which is why the difference cannot be decided by labels, vibe, or who appears more convincing.
Survival-based rejection describes a pattern where a child adapts to relational danger by aligning with one parent and suppressing attachment to the other. The rejection functions as a safety strategy rather than an independent, freely formed decision. Justified estrangement describes distancing that arises from substantiated risk or persistent relational harm, where the child’s appraisal is proportionate to lived experience and the child can usually tolerate some emotional complexity.
We offer a range of programs to support individuals and families in need. From food assistance to job training, our programs address important needs in our community.
Join us for one of our upcoming events! From fundraisers to community outreach events, we have a variety of opportunities to get involved and support our mission.
See the impact of our work through the success stories of those we serve. These stories highlight the positive changes that can happen when we come together to support our community.
Have a question or want to learn more about our organization? Get in touch with us today and we'll be happy to help.

Parental Alienating Behaviours
are Child Abuse & Family Violence.
This serious form of abuse and family violence can no longer be ignored. Parental alienating behaviours must be acknowledged in Australia as it is in other parts of the world. We need legislation that not only acknowledges its existence but firmly and clearly legislates against it.